|
Post by Reign on Jun 6, 2011 11:35:05 GMT -5
Check this out: www.engineeringtv.com/video/Opposed-Piston-Opposed-CylinderThis is no wimp engine. It's a two cylinder with four pistons delivering 300+ HP It's extremely small and very efficient and is presently in use in test applications. The configuration below is equivalent to a extremely ballsy four cylinder engine. When doubled, it's an extremely ballsy 600+ HP engine. It’s called OPOC (Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder), and it’s a turbocharged two-stroke, two-cylinder, with four pistons, two in each cylinder, that will run on gasoline, diesel or ethanol. The two pistons, inside a single cylinder, pump toward and away from each other, thus allowing a cycle to be completed twice as quickly as a conventional engine while balancing its own loads. The heavy lifting for this unconventional concept was performed Prof. Peter Hofbauer. During his 20 years at VW, Hofbauer headed up, among other things, development of VW’s first diesel engine and the VR6. The OPOC has been in development for several years, and the company claims it’s 30 percent lighter, one quarter the size and achieves 50 percent better fuel economy than a conventional turbo diesel engine. They’re predicting 100 MPG in a conventional car.
|
|
|
Post by 90GTVert on Jun 6, 2011 11:49:04 GMT -5
That's very interesting. Thanks for posting. My question is when do they make a 49cc version for us? ;D
|
|
|
Post by drawkward on Jun 6, 2011 12:08:54 GMT -5
How about a "SCOP" (Single Cylinder Opposed Piston)? Still have the benefits of zero loading on the bearings, and the benefits of short strokes and high rpms? You can tell I'm not an engineer, because it's probably very obvious why they haven't done that. But, that would make it much easier to fit in smaller packages - like scooters!
Needless to say, I'd love to see this in a bike. I guess the military has first dibs because they are the only ones paying for research and development right now. Yamaha needs to look into this.
Great find Ben! Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by Reign on Jun 6, 2011 15:16:43 GMT -5
Forget 49cc. With as small as the engine is already, I'd like to strap one on my Ninja Just imagine going from a 20 something HP 4-stroke to a 300+ HP 2-stroke, and still getting 100+ MPG! Probably more, seeing you arent trying to move a 1 ton car down the road. Just a few hundred pound motorcycle. Obviously you'd have to watch it on the throttle though. Things tend to rip apart when it's not designed for that much power
|
|
|
Post by marshinman on Jun 6, 2011 16:24:45 GMT -5
Thats is really interesting. I wonder who it was that came up with the design of the motor. I can see that being used in one of the little micro cars. At a 100 mpg you would not need a large fuel tank. Heck with getting one in a 49cc style lets just take that one and put it on a scooter.
|
|
|
Post by 90GTVert on Jun 6, 2011 17:51:02 GMT -5
There's nothing to tune on a 300+HP scooter so then it's no fun anymore. lol Give us a 49cc version so we can play with it. ;D
|
|
|
Post by marshinman on Jun 6, 2011 18:03:55 GMT -5
Sorry I forgot we have to leave something for Brent to tinker with... :disco:
|
|