|
|
Post by 1quikvento on Aug 4, 2011 9:39:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 90GTVert on Aug 4, 2011 10:23:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lshigham on Aug 4, 2011 12:07:51 GMT -5
They look good on paper, but the roller's are a pain to get. It's best to stick to the normal 6 roller configuration.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1quikvento on Aug 4, 2011 12:23:16 GMT -5
U know the first thing i thought about was what if i needed rollers in the future. Figured they'd be hard to find.
|
|
bigjeff
Scoot Enthusiast
just scootin
Posts: 294
|
Post by bigjeff on Aug 7, 2011 13:15:45 GMT -5
it sure is sexy looking though...just sayin'
|
|
mccanic
Scoot Enthusiast
Posts: 254
|
Post by mccanic on Aug 9, 2011 6:16:08 GMT -5
looks sometimes can be deceiving.... haha
|
|
tango
Scoot Enthusiast
Ad agendum semper parati
Posts: 389
|
Post by tango on Aug 9, 2011 10:07:47 GMT -5
Interesting. I suppose using progressively increasing weights (eg, 4g.5g.6g - 4g.5g.6g - etc) would give an increasing speed at which the variator closes. I suppose with that you can better match the action of the variator to the torque curve of the engine. But talking this and talking that...wouldn't it be cool to see an adjustable variator where you can set "econ", "normal" or "power" modes on the fly without having to get your hands dirty? My mind is buzzing as we speak...
|
|
